15 September 2025
Ah, educational research and policy-making—two fields that should, in theory, be best friends, holding hands and walking into the sunset together. But let's be real: more often than not, they're like distant cousins who only see each other at awkward family reunions.
Policymakers often charge ahead with reforms based on "gut feelings" or the opinions of some guy they met at a dinner party. Meanwhile, researchers are left screaming, "We have data for that!" into the void. So how do we bridge this gap? How can educational research actually, you know, matter when it comes to shaping policies that affect millions of students?
Buckle up, because we're about to take a deep dive into why educational research should be the MVP in policy-making—and why ignoring it is basically like driving blindfolded.
In other words, it’s the kind of research that could actually help improve schools—if only policy-makers paid attention.
Take standardized testing, for example. It sounds great in theory: hold schools accountable, measure student progress, ensure everyone is on the same page. But educational research has consistently shown that an over-reliance on standardized tests can lead to:
- Teaching to the test (aka turning classrooms into mind-numbing prep factories)
- Increased student stress (because obviously, more testing = more anxiety)
- Widening achievement gaps (because not all students have the same resources to prepare)
Yet, despite mountains of research pointing out these problems, standardized testing still dominates many education policies. Why? Because it feels like a good idea, even though research says otherwise.
Some reasons for this disconnect include:
- Time Constraints: Research takes time, but policymakers need answers yesterday.
- Complexity: Research findings aren’t always clear-cut or easy to implement in real-world settings.
- Politics: Let’s be honest—decisions are often made based on what will win votes, not what the data says.
- Communication Gaps: Researchers and policymakers speak different languages. One loves nuance; the other needs clear, actionable solutions.
The result? Policies that ignore the nuances of education research and end up doing more harm than good.
That means:
- Writing in plain English (because no one has time to decipher academic jargon)
- Summarizing key findings in easy-to-read formats (think: policy briefs, infographics, or even short videos)
- Making data visual and engaging (because a well-placed chart can say more than a thousand words)
Think of them as the diplomats of education—fluent in both "research-ese" and "politician-speak" who can navigate the tricky world of government decision-making.
For example, Finland’s education system—often hailed as one of the best in the world—is heavily informed by research. They prioritize teacher training, focus on creativity over rote memorization, and gasp listen to data-driven recommendations. And guess what? Their students perform exceptionally well.
Other countries could take a hint, but that requires a shift in mindset—from quick fixes to long-term, research-backed strategies.
Governments and educational organizations need to invest in research that actually addresses pressing policy issues. And that means funding studies designed with policymakers in mind, ensuring that findings are relevant and immediately applicable.
If a new policy contradicts existing research, they should have to explain why. This level of accountability would force politicians to move beyond catchy slogans and instead, base their decisions on what actually works.
The good news? Change is possible. By making research more accessible, bridging the communication gap, and demanding evidence-based decision-making, we can create an education system that actually benefits students—rather than just looking good on paper.
Because honestly, making policies without research is like baking a cake without a recipe. Sure, you might end up with something edible, but chances are, it’ll be a disaster.
all images in this post were generated using AI tools
Category:
Educational ResearchAuthor:
Madeleine Newton